@Nick: A KIP is only accepted if it got 3 binding votes, ie, votes from committers. If you close the vote before that, the KIP would not be accepted. Note that committers need to pay attention to a lot of KIPs and it can take a while until people can look into it. Thanks for your understanding.
@Jan: Can you give a little bit more context on your concerns? It's unclear why you mean atm. @Adam: anyone can vote :) -Matthias On 8/19/18 9:58 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote: > While I am not sure if I can or can’t vote, my question re: Jan’s comment is, > “should we be implementing it as Samza does?” > > I am not familiar with the drawbacks of the current approach vs how samza > does it. > >> On Aug 18, 2018, at 5:06 PM, n...@afshartous.com wrote: >> >> >> I only saw one vote on KIP-349, just checking to see if anyone else would >> like to vote before closing this out. >> -- >> Nick >> >> >>> On Aug 13, 2018, at 9:19 PM, n...@afshartous.com wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Calling for a vote on KIP-349 >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-349%3A+Priorities+for+Source+Topics >>> >>> -- >>> Nick >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
