Guess I need to carefully read the wiki page before asking :) Thanks!

Another qq after reading the proposal: is it a complimentary to KIP-58 (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-58+-+Make+Log+Compaction+Point+Configurable),
just that KIP-58 is a "upper-bound" on what messages can be compacted, and
this is for a "lower-bound" on what messages NEED to be compacted?


Guozhang

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:31 PM, xiongqi wu <xiongq...@gmail.com> wrote:

> HI Guozhang,
>
> As I mentioned in the motivation section, KIP-280 focuses on how to compact
> the log segment to resolve the out of order messages compaction issue.
> The issue we try to address in this KIP is different:  we want to introduce
> a compaction policy so that a log segment can be pickup for compaction
> after a specified time interval.  One use case is for GDPR to ensure timely
> deletion of user record.
>
> There is no conflict and overlapping between this KIP and KIP-280.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Xiongqi,
> >
> > I think this KIP is already been covered in KIP-280? Could you check out
> > that one and see if it is the case.
> >
> >
> > Guozhang
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:23 PM, xiongqi wu <xiongq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kafka,
> > >
> > > Just updated the confluence page to include the link to this KIP.
> > >
> > > Any comment will be appreciated:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-354%3A
> > > +Time-based+log+compaction+policy
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Xiongqi (Wesley) Wu
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:18 PM, xiongqi wu <xiongq...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Kafka,
> > > >
> > > > This KIP tries to address GDPR concern to fulfill deletion request on
> > > time
> > > > through time-based log compaction on a compaction enabled topic:
> > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 354%3A+Time-based+log+compaction+policy
> > > >
> > > > Any feedback will be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Xiongqi (Wesley) Wu
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Guozhang
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to