HI Guozhang, As I mentioned in the motivation section, KIP-280 focuses on how to compact the log segment to resolve the out of order messages compaction issue. The issue we try to address in this KIP is different: we want to introduce a compaction policy so that a log segment can be pickup for compaction after a specified time interval. One use case is for GDPR to ensure timely deletion of user record.
There is no conflict and overlapping between this KIP and KIP-280. Thank you! On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Xiongqi, > > I think this KIP is already been covered in KIP-280? Could you check out > that one and see if it is the case. > > > Guozhang > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:23 PM, xiongqi wu <xiongq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Kafka, > > > > Just updated the confluence page to include the link to this KIP. > > > > Any comment will be appreciated: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-354%3A > > +Time-based+log+compaction+policy > > > > Thank you. > > > > Xiongqi (Wesley) Wu > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:18 PM, xiongqi wu <xiongq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Kafka, > > > > > > This KIP tries to address GDPR concern to fulfill deletion request on > > time > > > through time-based log compaction on a compaction enabled topic: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 354%3A+Time-based+log+compaction+policy > > > > > > Any feedback will be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > Xiongqi (Wesley) Wu > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
