Hello Ray, I've added these two components. People should be able to use them creating / updating the JIRAs now.
Guozhang On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Ray Chiang <rchi...@apache.org> wrote: > I haven't seen any comments. Let me know if/when you add the new > components. Thanks. > > -Ray > > > > On 7/27/18 9:54 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > >> Hello Ray, >> >> Any PMC member of the project can add more components in the JIRA system. >> If there is no objection in the next 72 hours I can just go ahead and add >> them. >> >> >> Guozhang >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Ray Chiang <rchi...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks Guozhang. I'm good with the way the documentation is now. >>> >>> Is there any other procedure to follow to get "logging" and "mirrormaker" >>> added as components or can we just request a JIRA admin to do that on >>> this >>> list? >>> >>> -Ray >>> >>> >>> On 7/23/18 4:56 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: >>> >>> I've just updated the web docs on http://kafka.apache.org/contributing >>>> accordingly. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:30 PM, khaireddine Rezgui < >>>> khaireddine...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Good job Ray for the wiki, it's clear enough. >>>> >>>>> Le 23 juil. 2018 10:17 PM, "Ray Chiang" <rchi...@apache.org> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Okay, I've created a wiki page Reporting Issues in Apache Kafka >>>>> < >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/ >>>>> Reporting+Issues+in+Apache+Kafka>. >>>>> >>>>> I'd appreciate any feedback. If this is good enough, I can file a JIRA >>>>> to change the link under "Bugs" in the "Project information" page. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Ray >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/23/18 11:28 AM, Ray Chiang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Good point. I'll look into adding some JIRA guidelines to the >>>>>> documentation/wiki. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Ray >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/22/18 10:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Ray, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for brining this up. I'm generally +1 on the first two, while >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> the last category, personally I felt leaving them as part of `tools` >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> fine, but I'm also open for other opinions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A more general question though, is that today we do not have any >>>>>>> guidelines >>>>>>> to ask JIRA reporters to set the right component, i.e. it is purely >>>>>>> best-effort, and we cannot disallow reporters to add any new >>>>>>> component >>>>>>> names. And so far the project does not really have a tradition to >>>>>>> manage >>>>>>> JIRA reports per-component, as the goal is to not "separate" the >>>>>>> project >>>>>>> into silos but recommending everyone to get hands on every aspect of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Guozhang >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Ray Chiang <rchi...@apache.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been doing a little bit of component cleanup in JIRA. What do >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>> think of adding >>>>>>>> one or more of the following components? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - logging: For any consumer/producer/broker logging (i.e. log4j). >>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>> should help disambiguate from the "log" component (i.e. Kafka >>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - mirrormaker: There are enough requests specific to MirrorMaker >>>>>>>> that it >>>>>>>> could be put into its own component. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - scripts: I'm a little more ambivalent about this one, but any of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> bin/*.sh script fixes could belong in their own category. I'm not >>>>>>>> sure if >>>>>>>> other people feel strongly for how the "tools" component should be >>>>>>>> used >>>>>>>> w.r.t. the run scripts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Ray >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >> > -- -- Guozhang
