I've just updated the web docs on http://kafka.apache.org/contributing accordingly.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:30 PM, khaireddine Rezgui < khaireddine...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good job Ray for the wiki, it's clear enough. > > Le 23 juil. 2018 10:17 PM, "Ray Chiang" <rchi...@apache.org> a écrit : > > Okay, I've created a wiki page Reporting Issues in Apache Kafka > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/ > Reporting+Issues+in+Apache+Kafka>. > > I'd appreciate any feedback. If this is good enough, I can file a JIRA > to change the link under "Bugs" in the "Project information" page. > > > -Ray > > > On 7/23/18 11:28 AM, Ray Chiang wrote: > > Good point. I'll look into adding some JIRA guidelines to the > > documentation/wiki. > > > > -Ray > > > > On 7/22/18 10:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > >> Hello Ray, > >> > >> Thanks for brining this up. I'm generally +1 on the first two, while for > >> the last category, personally I felt leaving them as part of `tools` is > >> fine, but I'm also open for other opinions. > >> > >> A more general question though, is that today we do not have any > >> guidelines > >> to ask JIRA reporters to set the right component, i.e. it is purely > >> best-effort, and we cannot disallow reporters to add any new component > >> names. And so far the project does not really have a tradition to manage > >> JIRA reports per-component, as the goal is to not "separate" the project > >> into silos but recommending everyone to get hands on every aspect of the > >> project. > >> > >> > >> Guozhang > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Ray Chiang <rchi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> I've been doing a little bit of component cleanup in JIRA. What do > >>> people > >>> think of adding > >>> one or more of the following components? > >>> > >>> - logging: For any consumer/producer/broker logging (i.e. log4j). This > >>> should help disambiguate from the "log" component (i.e. Kafka > >>> messages). > >>> > >>> - mirrormaker: There are enough requests specific to MirrorMaker > >>> that it > >>> could be put into its own component. > >>> > >>> - scripts: I'm a little more ambivalent about this one, but any of the > >>> bin/*.sh script fixes could belong in their own category. I'm not > >>> sure if > >>> other people feel strongly for how the "tools" component should be used > >>> w.r.t. the run scripts. > >>> > >>> Any thoughts? > >>> > >>> -Ray > >>> > >>> > >> > > > -- -- Guozhang
