+1 (non-binding). TY!

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > Thanks Ismael.
> >
> > --Vahid
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <quilcate.jo...@gmail.com>
> > To:     dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date:   04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > Subject:        Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> >
> > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<manikumar.re...@gmail.com
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding).
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > steph...@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > >
> > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <g...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the
> > > June
> > > > > 2018
> > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > post:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> major
> > > > > version
> > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated
> > > prior
> > > > to
> > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that
> > we
> > > can
> > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> rolling
> > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > haven't
> > > > been
> > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest
> > > > message
> > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no
> > loss
> > > of
> > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during
> > the
> > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can
> > > discuss
> > > > > more
> > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=lBt342M2PM_
> 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> >
> > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > > | blog
> > > > > <
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to