+1 (non binding), thanks
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Singh <rahul.xavier.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Apr 18, 2018, 5:12 PM -0500, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>, wrote: >> +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Edoardo Comar <eco...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> > thanks Ismael >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Edoardo Comar >> > >> > IBM Message Hub >> > >> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com >> > To: dev <dev@kafka.apache.org >> > Date: 18/04/2018 22:05 >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018 >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi Ismael, Thanks for following this up. >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Rajini >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > -------- Original message --------From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk >> > > Date: 4/18/18 11:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev <dev@kafka.apache.org >> > > Subject: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018 >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June >> > 2018 >> > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post: >> > > >> > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major >> > version >> > > bump due to semantic versioning. >> > > >> > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior >> > to >> > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can >> > > move faster. >> > > >> > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling >> > upgrade >> > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't >> > been >> > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest >> > message >> > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of >> > > functionality. >> > > >> > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the >> > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss >> > more >> > > if needed (of course). >> > > >> > > Ismael >> > > >> > > [1] >> > > >> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists. >> > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93 >> > &d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0 >> > OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=JJocxOdv9dM3JXFwj2wYoHmVn9uDo5LSaIpu2MFZf3E&s= >> > cVke94qmd9h7EH2TscT6aiaT9bMkdiPc4Vr9AVLwxrQ&e= >> > >> > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Unless stated otherwise above: >> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >> > 741598. >> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU >> >
