Thanks everyone for the feedback and votes. The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Jun, Ismael, me) and 6 non-binding votes (Edo, Mickael, Tom, Ted, Tao, Manikumar).
I will update the KIP page. Regards, Rajini On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 7:26 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Rajini. This is a useful improvement, so +1 (binding) > from me. > > I really don't like how the Java Security classes work, so I would have > preferred to avoid emulating them, but the KIP is consistent with previous > related KIPs and that's the direction we chose previously. Also, I think I > might have tried to reduce the number of configs from 2 to 1 (in broker and > client) by relying more on Java, but I don't have a concrete proposal and > it would result in a larger API surface area. > > Ismael > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start the voting process for KIP-86: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 86%3A+Configurable+SASL+callback+handlers > > > > The KIP makes callback handlers for SASL configurable to make it simpler > to > > integrate with custom authentication database or custom authentication > > servers. This is particularly useful for SASL/PLAIN where the > > implementation in Kafka based on credentials stored in jaas.conf is not > > suitable for production use. It is also useful for SCRAM in environments > > where ZooKeeper is not secure. > > > > Thank you... > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > >
