+1 -------- Original message --------From: Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com> Date: 12/11/17 6:06 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-86: Configurable SASL callback handlers +1 (non-binding)
On 5 May 2017 at 11:57, Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP Rajini, this will significantly simplify providing > custom credential providers > +1 (non binding) > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Can we have some more reviews or votes for this KIP to include in > 0.11.0.0? > > It is not a breaking change and the code is ready for integration, so it > > will be good to get it in if possible. > > > > Ismael/Jun, since you had reviewed the KIP earlier, can you let me know > if > > I can do anything more to get your votes? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Rajini > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Edoardo Comar <eco...@uk.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non binding) > >> many thanks Rajini ! > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------- > >> Edoardo Comar > >> IBM MessageHub > >> eco...@uk.ibm.com > >> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > >> > >> IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number > >> 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. > PO6 > >> 3AU > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org > >> Date: 06/04/2017 10:53 > >> Subject: [VOTE] KIP-86: Configurable SASL callback handlers > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for KIP-86: > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > >> 86%3A+Configurable+SASL+callback+handlers > >> > >> > >> The KIP makes callback handlers for SASL configurable to make it simpler > >> to > >> integrate with custom authentication database or custom authentication > >> servers. This is particularly useful for SASL/PLAIN where the > >> implementation in Kafka based on credentials stored in jaas.conf is not > >> suitable for production use. It is also useful for SCRAM in environments > >> where ZooKeeper is not secure. > >> > >> Thank you... > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Rajini > >> > >> > >> > >> Unless stated otherwise above: > >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > >> 741598. > >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU > >> >