It must be two different names, as we add two processor to the topology: a source processor that only read the data from a topic, and the actual processor that maintains the global table.
-Matthias On 1/2/18 7:14 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote: > +1 binding, seems like a nice simplification. > > Regarding the source and processor name, do they actually need to be unique > or could they use the same value? Since these use incrementing integers, it > could be nice for debuggability/understanding to have them use the same > name if possible instead of generating 2 separate names. > > -Ewen > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On a side note, could you update the "compatibility and upgrade" section, >> that when users start to make code changes to leverage the new API, what >> kind of upgrade executions they'd need to do? I feel they need to rename >> topics / etc. >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1, thanks! >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Matthias J. Sax < >> matth...@confluent.io >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/26/17 9:00 PM, Panuwat Anawatmongkhon wrote: >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> I would like to start the vote thread. >>>>>>> This is link for the kip. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-233% >>>> 3A+Simplify+ >>>>>> StreamsBuilder%23addGlobalStore >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- Guozhang >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Guozhang >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
