+1 binding, seems like a nice simplification. Regarding the source and processor name, do they actually need to be unique or could they use the same value? Since these use incrementing integers, it could be nice for debuggability/understanding to have them use the same name if possible instead of generating 2 separate names.
-Ewen On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On a side note, could you update the "compatibility and upgrade" section, > that when users start to make code changes to leverage the new API, what > kind of upgrade executions they'd need to do? I feel they need to rename > topics / etc. > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1, thanks! > > > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Matthias J. Sax < > matth...@confluent.io > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > On 12/26/17 9:00 PM, Panuwat Anawatmongkhon wrote: > >> > > > Hi all, > >> > > > I would like to start the vote thread. > >> > > > This is link for the kip. > >> > > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-233% > >> 3A+Simplify+ > >> > > StreamsBuilder%23addGlobalStore > >> > > > > >> > > > Cheers > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
