Your understanding is correct and thanks for voting. I am also +1 :)
I am closing this vote as accepted with 3 binding (Gwen, Guozhang, Damian) and 3 non-binding (Ted, Bill, Matthias) votes. -Matthias On 11/20/17 9:58 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 > > My understanding is that the KIP is going to take two existing parameters > (retries and retries-backoff) and apply them to GlobalKTable implementation > where previously the settings were ignored and behavior was hard-coded. > > If my understanding is incorrect, please disregard my vote. > > Gwen > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:44 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 02:40 Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the KIP, +1 >>>> >>>> -Bill >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax < >>> matth...@confluent.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi @all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to start the vote for KIP-224: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >>>>>> 224%3A+Add+configuration+parameter+%60retries%60+to+Streams+API >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Guozhang >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
