+1 My understanding is that the KIP is going to take two existing parameters (retries and retries-backoff) and apply them to GlobalKTable implementation where previously the settings were ignored and behavior was hard-coded.
If my understanding is incorrect, please disregard my vote. Gwen On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:44 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 02:40 Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 > > > > > > -Bill > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax < > > matth...@confluent.io> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi @all, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start the vote for KIP-224: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > 224%3A+Add+configuration+parameter+%60retries%60+to+Streams+API > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
