w.r.t. KIP-182, KAFKA-5651 has been resolved. But the KIP is still labeled Under Discussion.
Should KIP-182 be moved to Adopted state ? On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP. > > Two comments/questions: > > - how does this relate to `KStream#through()` ? > - do we really need to add new overload or can we just extends exiting > options (cf KIP-182); it would be create if we could just extend > existing classes like `Produced` instead of adding new methods to "main" > classes > > Maybe, we could use `through()` to create a topics in the back ground > and picky back all to `Produced`. > > > -Matthias > > On 11/4/17 4:16 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > API is given without much javadoc on the role / meaning of method > > parameters. > > > > Can you enrich with descriptive javadoc ? > > > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Jeyhun Karimov <je.kari...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Dear community, > >> > >> I would like to initiate discussion on KIP-221 [1] based on issue [2]. > >> Please feel free to comment. > >> > >> [1] > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > >> 221%3A+Repartition+Topic+Hints+in+Streams > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6037 > >> > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Jeyhun > >> > > > >
