Hi James,

Isn't PR 3799 purely a code refactoring (i.e. no change in behaviour)? If
so, it would probably land in trunk only after today. If it's new
functionality, then it depends on size, risk and importance. If you think
it's important and should target 1.0.0, feel free to make your case in the
JIRA or PR.

Thanks,
Ismael

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:59 PM, James Cheng <wushuja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi. I'm a little unclear on what types of things are subject to the
> "Feature Freeze" today (Sept 20th).
>
> For changes such as https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799 <
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799> and https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/KAFKA-3480 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480>
> that don't require KIPs, is today the freeze date? If I have PR created but
> not yet reviewed, does that mean it is eligible to get into 1.0.0?
>
> And if I have a PR that comes AFTER today, does that mean it is NOT
> eligible for 1.0.0?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -James
>
> > On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sure! Please feel free to update the wiki.
> >
> >
> > Guozhang
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Guozhang,
> >>
> >> Can KIP-188 be added to the list, please? The vote has passed and PR
> should
> >> be ready soon.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Rajini
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Actually my bad, there is already a voting thread and you asked people
> to
> >>> recast a vote on a small change.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Tom,
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems KIP-183 is still in the discussion phase, and voting has not
> >>> been
> >>>> started?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Guozhang
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Would it be possible to add KIP-183 to the list too, please?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tom
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6 September 2017 at 22:04, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Vahid,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes I have just added it while sending this email :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Guozhang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> >>>>>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Guozhang,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for the heads-up.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Can KIP-163 be added to the list?
> >>>>>>> The proposal for this KIP is accepted, and the PR is ready for
> >>> review.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>> --Vahid
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From:   Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> To:     "dev@kafka.apache.org" <dev@kafka.apache.org>
> >>>>>>> Date:   09/06/2017 01:45 PM
> >>>>>>> Subject:        1.0.0 KIPs Update
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello folks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a heads up on 1.0.0 progress:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.a
> >>>>>>> pache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D717649
> >>>>>>> 13&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> >>>>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=bLvgeykOujjty9joOuWXD4wZab
> >>>>>>> o1CV0pULY4eqBxqzk&s=90UN7ejzCQmdPOyRR_
> >> 2z304xLUSBCtOYi0KqhAo4EyU&e=
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We have one week left towards the KIP deadline, which is Sept.
> >> 13th.
> >>>>>> There
> >>>>>>> are still a lot of KIPs that under discussion / voting process.
> >> For
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> KIP
> >>>>>>> proposer, please keep in mind that the voting has to be done
> >> before
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> deadline in order to be added into the coming release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -- Guozhang
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Guozhang
>
>

Reply via email to