The vote has passed. with three binding +1s (Jun, Ismael and Jason), no -1s or +0s.
Thanks to those who commented and voted. On 13 September 2017 at 23:22, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1. Thanks for the KIP. Just one minor clarification: when no assignment is > specified by the user, what will be sent in the protocol? A null assignment > array? Probably worth mentioning this case explicitly in the KIP. > > Thanks, > Jason > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This KIP currently has 2 binding +1 votes. Today is the deadline for KIPs > > to be added to Kafka 1.0.0. So if anyone else would like to see this > > feature in 1.0.0 they will need to vote by the end of the day. > > > > If there are insufficient votes for the KIP to be adopted today then I > will > > keep the vote open for a while longer, but it won't be in 1.0.0 even if > the > > vote is eventually successful. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tom > > > > On 13 September 2017 at 11:43, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Tom, > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding) from me. > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to start the vote on KIP-195 which adds an AdminClient > API > > > for > > > > increasing the number of partitions of a topic. The details are here: > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 195%3A+AdminClient > > > . > > > > createPartitions > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > >
