> On May 25, 2017, at 14:27, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP Eno!
Yes, thank you Eno! It’s very welcome and heartening to see work on this front. I have a few follow-ups to Matthias’ comments: > Why we introduce `ExceptionType` and not just hand in the actual exception? I was wondering this myself. > As return type of `handle()` is void, how would the handler fail? By > throwing an exception? I was wondering this myself. > Maybe it would be better to add a proper return > type from the beginning on -- this might also make backward > compatibility easier later on. I agree, that would be very clear. > With regard to `DeserializationException`, do you thing it might make > sense to have a "dead letter queue" as a feature to provide out-of-the-box? +1 that would be *fantastic*! Thanks! Avi ———— Software Architect @ Park Assist » http://tech.parkassist.com/
