Hi Matthias,
For the AdminClient, client configuration is needed. And for zookeeper, no
properties are required.
So, in other tools like consumerGroupCommand, they used the command config
option.
I think consumer-config and consumer-property are not required here. We
will use the configurations passed through command-config for both admin
client and Embedded consumer.

Thanks,
Bharat


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Couple of follow ups.
>
> The reset tool uses AdminClient, ZkUtils, and a KafkaConsumer
> internally. Thus, I am wondering if we need the possibility to specify
> configs for all of them?
>
> The original JIRA reported, that the reset tool does not work for a
> secured cluster, and thus, I doubt that consumer properties are
> sufficient for resolve this.
>
> Maybe some people that are more familiar with Kafka security can help
> out here. I personally have only limited knowledge about this topic.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
>
> On 5/19/17 11:09 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> > Thanks for the info, Matthias.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bharat
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
> >> is strict.
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >> On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>> I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across
> >> all
> >>> tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be
> >> needed
> >>> for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think
> this
> >> is
> >>> minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset tool) as
> >> without
> >>> this consumer config options, it will not be possible to use the tool
> in
> >> a
> >>> secured environment. Please let me know your thoughts on this. If it
> >> needs
> >>> to be moved to next release, I will work on this as part of KIP 14.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Bharat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
> matth...@confluent.io
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of
> KIP-14)
> >>>> and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be
> best,
> >>>> to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your contributions!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/17/17 12:56 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP
> >> for
> >>>>> this
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> >>>> 14+-+Tools+Standardization
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Bharat
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev <
> bigdatadev...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
> >>>>>> For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that
> as
> >>>> part
> >>>>>> of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Bharat
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax <
> >> matth...@confluent.io
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
> >>>>>>> parameters over all tools would be great!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Matthias
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> >> e...@confluent.io
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we
> should
> >>>>>>>>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across
> all
> >>>>>>> tools so
> >>>>>>>>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that
> KIP...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP
> providing
> >>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>> standardized settings that we could get future additions
> >>>> automatically
> >>>>>>>>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a
> >>>>>>> consumer.config
> >>>>>>>>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations
> for
> >>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names
> that
> >>>> are
> >>>>>>>>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path
> >> forward
> >>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>> future tools.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first
> started
> >>>> on
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to
> >> be
> >>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Ewen
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <
> >>>> eno.there...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1 thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Eno
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I
> would
> >>>>>>> like
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config
> options
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> streams reset tool
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> >>>>>>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
> >>>>>>>>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bharat
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to