+1 (binding) I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP... I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a consumer.config or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for other tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for future tools. I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on the project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be more consistent. This has been an issue for many years now... -Ewen On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 thanks. > > Eno > > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to > > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to > > streams reset tool > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>* > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bharat > >
