+1 (non binding) Thanks
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Onur, > > We already discussed similar on the Discussion thread and decided to move > forward with a broker config. > > Thanks, > Damian > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 at 02:40 Onur Karaman <onurkaraman.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It seems like there generally has been the assumption that the broker needs >> to know about this delay either from its own config or provided over the >> wire from clients. Is this actually true? >> >> One alternative I don't think was mentioned was to make this delay concept >> be completely client-side. >> >> What I mean by this is maybe we can just locally postpone on the client any >> message consumption or callback trigger from happening for the first N >> seconds after rebalance. The client in the meantime can heartbeat and get >> notified of rebalances during this delay. >> >> I haven't really thought it through in detail. Please let me know if I'm >> missing something. >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 Thanks for the KIP! >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 Thanks for the KIP! >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Sorry about the previous email, Gmail seems be collapsing them >> into a >> > > > > single thread on my inbox. >> > > > > >> > > > > Guozhang >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Guozhang Wang < >> wangg...@gmail.com> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Damian, could you create a new thread for the voting process? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Guozhang >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> +1(non-binding) >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Eno Thereska < >> > > eno.there...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > +1 (non binding) >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Thanks >> > > > > >> > Eno >> > > > > >> > > On 30 Mar 2017, at 18:01, Matthias J. Sax < >> > > matth...@confluent.io> >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > On 3/30/17 3:46 AM, Damian Guy wrote: >> > > > > >> > >> Hi All, >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> I'd like to start the voting thread on KIP-134: >> > > > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >> > > > > >> > 134%3A+Delay+initial+consumer+group+rebalance >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> Thanks, >> > > > > >> > >> Damian >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > -- Guozhang >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > -- Guozhang >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
