Hi Onur, We already discussed similar on the Discussion thread and decided to move forward with a broker config.
Thanks, Damian On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 at 02:40 Onur Karaman <onurkaraman.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems like there generally has been the assumption that the broker needs > to know about this delay either from its own config or provided over the > wire from clients. Is this actually true? > > One alternative I don't think was mentioned was to make this delay concept > be completely client-side. > > What I mean by this is maybe we can just locally postpone on the client any > message consumption or callback trigger from happening for the first N > seconds after rebalance. The client in the meantime can heartbeat and get > notified of rebalances during this delay. > > I haven't really thought it through in detail. Please let me know if I'm > missing something. > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Sorry about the previous email, Gmail seems be collapsing them > into a > > > > > single thread on my inbox. > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Guozhang Wang < > wangg...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Damian, could you create a new thread for the voting process? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> +1(non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Eno Thereska < > > > eno.there...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > +1 (non binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks > > > > > >> > Eno > > > > > >> > > On 30 Mar 2017, at 18:01, Matthias J. Sax < > > > matth...@confluent.io> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > +1 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On 3/30/17 3:46 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > > > > > >> > >> Hi All, > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> I'd like to start the voting thread on KIP-134: > > > > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > >> > 134%3A+Delay+initial+consumer+group+rebalance > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> > >> Damian > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
