I've updated JIRA versions and the KIP wiki page. Ismael
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had > covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went > ahead and updated the wiki page to specify the next version as 0.11.0.0. > I'll update JIRA versions and the KIP page soon. > > Ismael > > [1] "We change the message format, in which case we bump to 0.11.x" in > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the release >> manager for our next time-based release. See https://cwiki.apache.org/c >> onfluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan if you missed previous >> communication on time-based releases or need a reminder. >> >> I put together a draft release plan with June 2017 as the release month >> (as previously agreed) and a list of KIPs that have already been voted: >> >> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68716876 >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68716876>* >> >> I haven't set exact dates for the various stages (feature freeze, code >> freeze, etc.) for now as Ewen is going to send out an email with some >> suggested tweaks based on his experience as release manager for 0.10.2.0. >> We can set the exact dates after that discussion. >> >> As we are starting the process early this time, we should expect the >> number of KIPs in the plan to grow (so don't worry if your KIP is not there >> yet), but it's good to see that we already have 10 (including 2 merged and >> 2 with PR reviews in progress). >> >> Out of the KIPs listed, KIP-98 (Exactly-once and Transactions) and >> KIP-101 (Leader Generation in Replication) require message format changes, >> which typically imply a major version bump (i.e. 0.11.0.0). If we do that, >> then it makes sense to also include KIP-106 (Unclean leader election should >> be false by default) and KIP-118 (Drop support for Java 7). We would also >> take the chance to remove deprecated code, in that case. >> >> Given the above, how do people feel about 0.11.0.0 as the next Kafka >> version? Please share your thoughts. >> >> Thanks, >> Ismael >> > >
