+1 (non-binding).

Thanks, Ismael.

cheers,
Colin


On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, at 19:47, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the release
> manager for our next time-based release. See https://cwiki.apache.org/c
> onfluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan if you missed previous
> communication on time-based releases or need a reminder.
> 
> I put together a draft release plan with June 2017 as the release month
> (as
> previously agreed) and a list of KIPs that have already been voted:
> 
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68716876
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68716876>*
> 
> I haven't set exact dates for the various stages (feature freeze, code
> freeze, etc.) for now as Ewen is going to send out an email with some
> suggested tweaks based on his experience as release manager for 0.10.2.0.
> We can set the exact dates after that discussion.
> 
> As we are starting the process early this time, we should expect the
> number
> of KIPs in the plan to grow (so don't worry if your KIP is not there
> yet),
> but it's good to see that we already have 10 (including 2 merged and 2
> with
> PR reviews in progress).
> 
> Out of the KIPs listed, KIP-98 (Exactly-once and Transactions) and
> KIP-101
> (Leader Generation in Replication) require message format changes, which
> typically imply a major version bump (i.e. 0.11.0.0). If we do that, then
> it makes sense to also include KIP-106 (Unclean leader election should be
> false by default) and KIP-118 (Drop support for Java 7). We would also
> take
> the chance to remove deprecated code, in that case.
> 
> Given the above, how do people feel about 0.11.0.0 as the next Kafka
> version? Please share your thoughts.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ismael

Reply via email to