[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880268#comment-15880268 ]
Ciprian Pascu commented on KAFKA-4788: -------------------------------------- I am using command like this to create the topic: bin/kafka-topics.sh --create --zookeeper x.x.x.x:2181 --replication-factor 1 --partitions 1 --topic test --config retention.bytes=2675303 The outcome is: Error while executing topic command : segment.bytes 1073741824 is not less than or equal to retention.bytes 2675303 [2017-02-23 13:08:04,797] ERROR org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidConfigurationException: segment.bytes 1073741824 is not less than or equal to retention.bytes 2675303 (kafka.admin.TopicCommand$) This was working fine in version 0.10.1.1. > Broker level configuration 'log.segment.bytes' not used when 'segment.bytes' > not configured per topic. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: KAFKA-4788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4788 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Bug > Components: log > Affects Versions: 0.10.2.0 > Reporter: Ciprian Pascu > > In the previous version, if there was not topic level configuration > 'segment.bytes', then the corresponding value from the broker configuration > was used (for 'segment.bytes', this is the value configured for > 'log.segment.bytes'); in 0.10.2.0, if the configuration at topic level is > missing, then the value configured at broker level is not used, some kind of > default value for that broker level configuration is used (for > 'log.retention.bytes', this is 'val LogSegmentBytes = 1 * 1024 * 1024 * > 1024'). > However, in the documentation it is said: 'A given server default config > value only applies to a topic if it does not have an explicit topic config > override.'; so, according to this, if there is, for example, no value > configured for 'segment.bytes', then the value configured for > 'log.segment.bytes' should be used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)