+1 (non-binding).
> On 10 Feb 2017, at 13:40, Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com> wrote: > > I'm +0 (non-binding) on this now. I think the proposal here adds quite a > lot of complexity to Kafka, makes building client libraries much harder, > and is going to confuse users a lot. I'm also worried about this feature > being hard to implement, and/or testing not being rigorous enough - Aphyr's > Jepsen series shows how hard this kind of functionality is to get right in > real world environments in the face of network failures. Those tests take > hundreds of person-hours to conduct and analyze, and I hope this community > will put in similar time in stabilizing this tricky feature before it > reaches a released version. > > However, exactly-once processing is very useful, and my non-binding > reservations probably shouldn't hold the project back. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello community, >> >> We have made a few changes based on the comments in this thread as well as >> the DISCUSS thread. Summary of the changes can be found in the update >> history (2017/02/03 and 2017/02/07) of the design doc: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Jqy_GjUGtdXJK94XGsEIK7CP1SnQGdp2eF >> 0wSw9ra8/edit#heading=h.i8usz7jt7ms6 >> >> And details of the changes can be found here: >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg66069.html >> >> >> We'd like to solicit another round of voting for 72 hours due to these >> changes, and people who have voted before on this thread are welcome to >> re-review and vote again. Thanks! >> >> >> Guozhang >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> (with additional authorization from Jason's note in the discussion >> thread) >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Apurva Mehta <apu...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >>> >>>> The wiki has been updated with a section on authorization, as well a >>>> summary of the message format changes. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Tom, we'll update the wiki to reflect all the movement on the >>>> design >>>>> document. Did you have a specific concern with the new ACLs? >>>>> >>>>> -Jason >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>>> >>>>>> That is a good point. During the discussion, it was agreed that >>> changes >>>>> to >>>>>> public interfaces (message format, protocol, ACLs, etc.) would be >>>> copied >>>>> to >>>>>> the wiki once the things had settled down, but it looks like that >>>> hasn't >>>>>> been done yet. I agree that it makes sense to do it before people >>> vote >>>> on >>>>>> it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ismael >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been slow at keeping up with the KIP and the discussion >>> thread. >>>>> This >>>>>>> is an exciting and quite complex new feature, which provides >> great >>>> new >>>>>>> functionality. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's a thing I noticed missing from the KIP that's present in >>> the >>>>>> google >>>>>>> doc - the doc talks about ACLs for TransactionalId. If those are >>>> going >>>>> to >>>>>>> land with the KIP, I think they should be included in the KIP >>> itself, >>>>> as >>>>>>> new ACLs are significant security changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Eno Thereska < >>>> eno.there...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Excellent work and discussions! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eno >>>>>>>>> On 2 Feb 2017, at 04:13, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We would like to start the voting process for KIP-98. The KIP >>> can >>>>> be >>>>>>>> found >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >>>>>>>> 98+-+Exactly+Once+Delivery+and+Transactional+Messaging >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Discussion thread can be found here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1jwZrr7HRHf?subj=+ >>>>>>>> DISCUSS+KIP+98+Exactly+Once+Delivery+and+Transactional+ >> Messaging >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Guozhang >>
