+1 for transactional.id. -Jason
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I have to choose between app.id and transactional.instance.id, I'd > choose the latter. > > Renaming transactional.instance.id to transactional.id sounds even better. > > > Guozhang > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Apurva Mehta <apu...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > Bumping one suggestion from Apurva above. The name "AppID" has caused > > some > > > confusion. We're considering the following renaming: > > > > > > 1. AppID -> ProducerId (transaction.app.id -> producer.id) > > > 2. PID -> IPID (internal producer ID) > > > > > > > > > How about AppId -> TransactionalId (transaction.app.id -> > transactional.id > > ) > > > > This makes it clear that this id just needs to be set when the > application > > wishes to use transactions. I also think it is more intuitive in the > > context of how this id is used, viz. to maintain transactions across > > producer sessions. > > > > Thanks, > > Apurva > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
