For 0.10.2.0, this can absolutely make it in if we get the reviews done
quickly enough. The cutoff for getting a new feature in would be the
feature freeze on Jan 13 (when we generate the release branch and start
having to cherry-pick commits, so we want to limit to stabilization and
important bug fixes).

See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan
for a more in depth explanation. I just sent out the announcement to make
sure everyone had a couple of weeks of warning.

-Ewen

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:

> I hate going back and forth on this, but KafkaProducer.close() (with
> no timeout) is equivalent to close(Long.MAX_VALUE,
> TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS), while the KafkaConsumer.close() is equivalent
> to close(30*1000,TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS).
>
> Isn't this kind of inconsistency best to avoid?
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thank you, Ismael. I have sent another one. Hopefully that will appear in
> > its own thread.
> >
> > Rajini
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Rajini. This seems to be happening a lot lately: Gmail is showing
> >> the vote message in the discuss thread.
> >>
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-102 - Add close with
> >> > timeout for consumers:*
> >> >
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> >> > 102+-+Add+close+with+timeout+for+consumers
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This KIP adds a new close method with a timeout for consumers similar
> to
> >> > the close method in the producer. As described in the discussion
> thread
> >> > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201612.
> mbox/%3cCAG_+
> >> > n9us5ohthwmyai9pz4s2j62fmils2ufj8oie9jpmyaf...@mail.gmail.com%3e>,
> >> > the changes are only in the close code path and hence the impact is
> not
> >> too
> >> > big. The existing close() method without a timeout will use a default
> >> > timeout of 30 seconds.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you...
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Rajini
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Gwen Shapira
> Product Manager | Confluent
> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> Follow us: Twitter | blog
>

Reply via email to