I think a separate KIP is a good idea as well.  Note however that potential
decisions in this KIP could affect the other KIP.

Nacho

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:

> Michael,
>
> Yes, doing a separate KIP to address the null payload issue for compacted
> topics is a good idea.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Michael Pearce <michael.pea...@ig.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I had noted that what ever the solution having compaction based on null
> > payload was agreed isn't elegant.
> >
> > Shall we raise another kip to : as discussed propose using a attribute
> bit
> > for delete/compaction flag as well/or instead of null value and updating
> > compaction logic to look at that delelete/compaction attribute
> >
> > I believe this is less contentious, so that at least we get that done
> > alleviating some concerns whilst the below gets discussed further?
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:56:52 PM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Kafka KIP meeting Oct 19 at 11:00am PST
> >
> > The following are the notes from today's KIP discussion.
> >
> >
> >    - KIP-82 - add record header: We agreed that there are use cases for
> >    third-party vendors building tools around Kafka. We haven't reached
> the
> >    conclusion whether the added complexity justifies the use cases. We
> will
> >    follow up on the mailing list with use cases, container format people
> > have
> >    been using, and details on the proposal.
> >
> >
> > The video will be uploaded soon in https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals .
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Everyone.,
> > >
> > > We plan to have a Kafka KIP meeting this coming Wednesday at 11:00am
> PST.
> > > If you plan to attend but haven't received an invite, please let me
> know.
> > > The following is the tentative agenda.
> > >
> > > Agenda:
> > > KIP-82: add record header
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
> > the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not
> > the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
> others
> > this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying
> > to this email or by telephone (+44(020 7896 0011) and then delete the
> email
> > and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusion (etc) that do not relate to
> the
> > official business of this company shall be understood as neither given
> nor
> > endorsed by it. IG is a trading name of IG Markets Limited (a company
> > registered in England and Wales, company number 04008957) and IG Index
> > Limited (a company registered in England and Wales, company number
> > 01190902). Registered address at Cannon Bridge House, 25 Dowgate Hill,
> > London EC4R 2YA. Both IG Markets Limited (register number 195355) and IG
> > Index Limited (register number 114059) are authorised and regulated by
> the
> > Financial Conduct Authority.
> >
>



-- 
Nacho (Ignacio) Solis
Kafka
nso...@linkedin.com

Reply via email to