Michael, Yes, doing a separate KIP to address the null payload issue for compacted topics is a good idea.
Thanks, Jun On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Michael Pearce <michael.pea...@ig.com> wrote: > I had noted that what ever the solution having compaction based on null > payload was agreed isn't elegant. > > Shall we raise another kip to : as discussed propose using a attribute bit > for delete/compaction flag as well/or instead of null value and updating > compaction logic to look at that delelete/compaction attribute > > I believe this is less contentious, so that at least we get that done > alleviating some concerns whilst the below gets discussed further? > > ________________________________________ > From: Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:56:52 PM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Subject: Re: Kafka KIP meeting Oct 19 at 11:00am PST > > The following are the notes from today's KIP discussion. > > > - KIP-82 - add record header: We agreed that there are use cases for > third-party vendors building tools around Kafka. We haven't reached the > conclusion whether the added complexity justifies the use cases. We will > follow up on the mailing list with use cases, container format people > have > been using, and details on the proposal. > > > The video will be uploaded soon in https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals . > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi, Everyone., > > > > We plan to have a Kafka KIP meeting this coming Wednesday at 11:00am PST. > > If you plan to attend but haven't received an invite, please let me know. > > The following is the tentative agenda. > > > > Agenda: > > KIP-82: add record header > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for > the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not > the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others > this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying > to this email or by telephone (+44(020 7896 0011) and then delete the email > and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusion (etc) that do not relate to the > official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor > endorsed by it. IG is a trading name of IG Markets Limited (a company > registered in England and Wales, company number 04008957) and IG Index > Limited (a company registered in England and Wales, company number > 01190902). Registered address at Cannon Bridge House, 25 Dowgate Hill, > London EC4R 2YA. Both IG Markets Limited (register number 195355) and IG > Index Limited (register number 114059) are authorised and regulated by the > Financial Conduct Authority. >
