+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 > > I want to clarify that the compatibility issue is only for unshaded > dependencies. Code and wire protocol will be compatible. > > Gwen > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > I'd like to open the vote for KIP-45. We've discussed several > alternatives > > on the mailing list and in the KIP call, but this vote is only on the > > documented KIP: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61337336. > > This > > change will not be compatible with 0.9, but it will provide a cleaner API > > long term for users to work with. This is really the last chance to make > an > > incompatible change like this with 0.10 shortly on the way, but > compatible > > options (such as method overloading) could be brought up again in the > > future if we find it's needed. > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > > -- Grant Henke Software Engineer | Cloudera gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
