+1 I think we should just do it and apologize and mark it stable.
Also, the javadocs do show the unstable annotation but it isn't easy to figure out exactly what that means. -Jay On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 > > I want to clarify that the compatibility issue is only for unshaded > dependencies. Code and wire protocol will be compatible. > > Gwen > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > >> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-45. We've discussed several alternatives >> on the mailing list and in the KIP call, but this vote is only on the >> documented KIP: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61337336. >> This >> change will not be compatible with 0.9, but it will provide a cleaner API >> long term for users to work with. This is really the last chance to make an >> incompatible change like this with 0.10 shortly on the way, but compatible >> options (such as method overloading) could be brought up again in the >> future if we find it's needed. >> >> Thanks, >> Jason >>
