> On July 7, 2015, 5:53 p.m., Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/KafkaController.scala, lines 898-903
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35820/diff/3/?file=1000895#file1000895line898>
> >
> >     I think we need to add the de-registration functions as other listeners 
> > upon controller re-designation?

Oops, missed de-registration part. Will provide a patch shortly. Thanks for 
catching this Guozhang!


- Ashish


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35820/#review90734
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 7, 2015, 5:04 a.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35820/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 7, 2015, 5:04 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1367
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1367
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1367: Broker topic metadata not kept in sync with ZooKeeper
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/common/TopicAndPartition.scala 
> df3db912f5daef6a25b4b2dd2220d2cc3795bce6 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/KafkaController.scala 
> 36350579b16027359d237b64699003358704ac6f 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/ReplicationUtils.scala 
> 60687332b4c9bee4d4c0851314cfb4b02d5d3489 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/ZkUtils.scala 
> 78475e3d5ec477cef00caeaa34ff2d196466be96 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/integration/TopicMetadataTest.scala 
> 995b05901491bb0dbf0df210d44bd1d7f66fdc82 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/utils/ReplicationUtilsTest.scala 
> c96c0ffd958d63c09880d436b2e5ae96f51ead36 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35820/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested on a test cluster with 3 Kafka brokers
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to