-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#review76975
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for the new patch. I really like the desgin of this test! A few minor 
comments below.


core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127091>

    The Try syntax doesn't seem to be supported in scala 2.9.
    
    ./gradlew -PscalaVersion=2.9.1 testJar
    
    kafka/core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala:29: 
Try is not a member of scala.util
    import scala.util.Try



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127122>

    Could we note that all times are in millisecs?



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127085>

    why => way



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127086>

    Could you add a comment on what 0.674490d stands for?



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127110>

    Now that we are completing the request in CompleteQueue explicitly, do we 
still need to override isCompleted()?



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127104>

    We probably can make this a ShutdownableThread.



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127102>

    Do we need the while loop? Could we just do a if test and go back to the 
outer loop?



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127105>

    Would it be more reliable to call forceComplete() here? Not sure if 
delayQueue always returns an item at the precise time.



core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/#comment127107>

    Could we just put FakeOperation to the delayQueue directly instead of 
wrapping it under Scheduled?


- Jun Rao


On March 19, 2015, 11:31 p.m., Yasuhiro Matsuda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 19, 2015, 11:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-2013
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2013
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> purgatory micro benchmark
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/test/scala/other/kafka/TestPurgatoryPerformance.scala PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31893/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yasuhiro Matsuda
> 
>

Reply via email to