-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/#review62547
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Minor comment.


core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/#comment104603>

    I think it is more suitable to have this access control implemented inside 
ReplicaManager. One can argue both ways though...


- Joel Koshy


On Nov. 19, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Guozhang Wang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 19, 2014, 7:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1580
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1580
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add the logic for checking internal topics in the replica manager layer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/AdminUtils.scala 
> 94c53320b768b83b0324336b73cc06537c0fe78d 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala 
> 968b0c4f809ea9f9c3f322aef9db105f9d2e0e23 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/OffsetManager.scala 
> 2957bc435102bc4004d8f100dbcdd56287c8ffae 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
> 3007a6d89b637b93f71fdb7adab561a93d9c4c62 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerFailureHandlingTest.scala 
> 8531f533f3a6431f4f9fc8cb1ad3e9f1f1b110e0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guozhang Wang
> 
>

Reply via email to