> That being said, if the fix is small and > merges before we cut the first RC, I am fine with merging it to 4.0 > too.
yes, the fix is small and I have merged it into 4.0 (see https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/8797c903eef894e63fa15710cf446715eceb9198) Best, Chia-Ping On 2025/02/15 16:08:18 David Jacot wrote: > Hi Chia-Ping, > > Thanks for letting me know. Is it a regression in 4.0? If not, it does > not qualify as a blocker. That being said, if the fix is small and > merges before we cut the first RC, I am fine with merging it to 4.0 > too. > > Best, > David > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 1:11 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > hi David > > > > I have created KAFKA-18803 to address a bug. The fix is straightforward so > > we can merge it soon. > > > > Best, > > Chia-Ping > > > > On 2025/02/13 21:55:23 Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > > > hi David > > > > > > I have opened KAFKA-18790 to address a flaky test that causes timeouts in > > > the CI environment due to the AsyncConsumer getting stuck during testing. > > > While this issue does not directly impact production code, it can > > > significantly hinder our ability to run comprehensive tests for the 4.0.0 > > > release. Therefore, I plan to backport the fix to the 4.0.0 branch. The > > > root cause of the flakiness has been identified and documented in the > > > jira. > > > > > > Best, > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > On 2025/02/11 11:07:14 David Jacot wrote: > > > > Hi Edoardo, > > > > > > > > As it is a small bugfix, feel free to cherry-pick it to 4.0. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > David > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:52 AM Edoardo Comar <edoardli...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > is it too late to cherry pick > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18833 on 4.0.0 ? > > > > > (KAFKA-18758: NullPointerException in shutdown following > > > > > InvalidConfigurationException) > > > > > it's a clean merges and build - but should I wait for a 4.0.1 ? > > > > > thanks, Edo > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 18:45, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hi David > > > > > > > > > > > > I open a new blocker > > > > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18743) to remove a > > > > > > zk-related config `leader.imbalance.per.broker.percentage` which is > > > > > > used to limit the zk ops. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2025/02/05 12:41:55 Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > > > > > > > hi David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a documentation improvement for the zk legacy code related > > > > > > > to "<default>" > > > > > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18735). We initially > > > > > > > assumed "<default>" would be removed in 4.0, but this has proven > > > > > > > to be infeasible at this time. Therefore, it would be beneficial > > > > > > > to update the existing documentation and comments to reflect the > > > > > > > current reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2025/02/04 17:37:37 José Armando García Sancio wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again for being the release manager for 4.0.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have this bug that I would like to include in 4.0.0: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18723. I explained > > > > > > > > in a > > > > > > > > comment that it is not a regression but it would be good to > > > > > > > > include > > > > > > > > the fix if it makes the RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > -José > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
