+1 (binding), thanks for this KIP Tina

Edo

On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 12:31, Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP
>
> Mickael
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:05 AM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > A quick reminder that this KIP is still awaiting more votes. You can find
> > the implementation of this KIP in this draft PR:
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17524.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Regards,
> > Tina
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 4:37 PM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have raised a draft PR implementing this KIP here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17524, in case anyone is interested
> > > in taking a look.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tina
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:53 PM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thank you for voting Federico and Luke!
> > >>
> > >> Is there anyone else who would like to vote on this KIP please? It still
> > >> needs 2 more +1 binding :)
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Tina
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:40 AM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 non binding
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks Tina
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 5:29 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Hi Tina,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >>> > +1 (binding) from me.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Luke
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:03 PM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com
> > >>> >
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi everyone,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I would like to start voting for KIP-1073 that extends
> > >>> DescribeCluster API
> > >>> > > to optionally return fenced brokers in the response.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1073%3A+Return+fenced+brokers+in+DescribeCluster+response
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thanks.
> > >>> > > Gantigmaa
> > >>> > >
> > >>>
> > >>>

Reply via email to