Hi everyone,

A quick reminder that this KIP is still awaiting more votes. You can find
the implementation of this KIP in this draft PR:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17524.

Thanks!
Regards,
Tina

On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 4:37 PM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have raised a draft PR implementing this KIP here:
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17524, in case anyone is interested
> in taking a look.
>
> Regards,
> Tina
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:53 PM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for voting Federico and Luke!
>>
>> Is there anyone else who would like to vote on this KIP please? It still
>> needs 2 more +1 binding :)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tina
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:40 AM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 non binding
>>>
>>> Thanks Tina
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 5:29 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Tina,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the KIP.
>>> > +1 (binding) from me.
>>> >
>>> > Luke
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:03 PM Gantigmaa Selenge <gsele...@redhat.com
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi everyone,
>>> > >
>>> > > I would like to start voting for KIP-1073 that extends
>>> DescribeCluster API
>>> > > to optionally return fenced brokers in the response.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1073%3A+Return+fenced+brokers+in+DescribeCluster+response
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks.
>>> > > Gantigmaa
>>> > >
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to