Hi everyone,

The vote is now closed.
The KIP has been accepted with 4 binding votes and 1 non-binding vote.

binding: Kamal, Lianet, Luke, and Chia-Ping
non-binding: TengYao

Thanks to everyone for participating!

Regards,
Jiunn-Yang

> Kamal Chandraprakash <kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> 於 2024年11月11日 下午1:06 寫道:
> 
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> 
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 9:41 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding) from me.
>> 
>> Thanks for the KIP.
>> 
>> Luke
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 10:51 AM TengYao Chi <kiting...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> Thanks for KIP.
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> TengYao
>>> 
>>> 黃竣陽 <s7133...@gmail.com> 於 2024年11月11日 週一 上午10:41寫道:
>>> 
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>> I hope this message finds you well.
>>>> As the vote has been pending for three weeks, I would like to push it
>>>> manually.
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for your attention.
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Jiunn-Yang
>>>> 
>>>>> 黃竣陽 <s7133...@gmail.com> 於 2024年9月28日 上午10:04 寫道:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>> I hope this message finds you well.
>>>>> As the vote has been pending for more than two weeks, I would like to
>>>> push it
>>>>> manually.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you for your attention.
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Jiunn-Yang
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Lianet M. <liane...@gmail.com> 於 2024年9月10日 晚上11:06 寫道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for updating the KIP. Looks good to me now.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Lianet
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, 8:29 p.m. 黃竣陽 <s7133...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It make sense to me, I will change to
>>>>>>> `CreateDelegationTokenRequestData.setMaxLifetimeMs`
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@gmail.com> 於 2024年9月5日 晚上11:22 寫道:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> it aligns better with the RPC field (max_lifetime_ms)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> That makes sense to me. +1 to align it
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Chia-Ping
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Lianet M. <liane...@gmail.com> 於 2024年9月5日 週四 下午11:13寫道:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hey all, just one small comment: shouldn't the new method be
>> named
>>> "
>>>>>>>>> maxLifetimeMs()" (Lifetime vs LifeTime)? I believe it's the right
>>>>>>> spelling,
>>>>>>>>> but mostly, it aligns better with the RPC field
>> (max_lifetime_ms),
>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> generates a CreateDelegationTokenRequestData.maxLifetimeMs() and
>>>>>>>>> CreateDelegationTokenRequestData.setMaxLifetimeMs(...)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Lianet
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 9:36 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <
>> chia7...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 黃竣陽 <s7133...@gmail.com> 於 2024年9月5日 週四 下午9:08寫道:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to call for a vote on KIP-1080: <
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1080%3A+Fix+the+typo%3A+%60maxlifeTimeMs%60+in+CreateDelegationTokenOptions
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/00jvqxoo6d59k5z5cjm9wtj6dd075vro>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Jiunn-Yang
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to