Hi all,

I wanted to give a quick update on the 3.9.0 release.

We had several fixes in the last few days (KAFKA-17459, KAFKA-17584, etc.) and 
uncovered two new blocker bugs which now have PRs available (KAFKA-17608, 
KAFKA-17604). Once those are in, I'll create a new RC.

thanks, all.
Colin

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024, at 10:12, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thank you for working on this. Isn't this work part of KIP-1006? That 
> KIP hasn't even been approved (although it seems very likely to be so). 
> Certainly it isn't in 3.9. The PR is also kind of large with 16 files 
> changed. I think supporting new JDK versions that we haven't supported 
> before should be a 4.0 thing.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2024, at 09:44, Greg Harris wrote:
>> Hi Colin,
>>
>> It has been brought to my attention that Java 23 is now GA, and Kafka
>> clients, brokers, and connect are now experiencing
>> UnsupportedOperationExceptions by default due our use of the
>> deprecated-for-removal SecurityManager.
>> This only happens upon upgrading to Java 23, so this is not a regression.
>> Users can workaround this issue themselves by setting a system property or
>> by not upgrading to Java 23.
>>
>> I have implemented a patch to avoid these UnsupportedOperationExceptions,
>> and effectively make Kafka compatible with Java 23 by default.
>> Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17078 and the associated
>> PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16522
>> The patch has low risk for users which don't use SecurityManager. It has a
>> moderate risk for users that use SecurityManager, as we don't have good
>> visibility into those use-cases.
>>
>> Is this something that you want to include in 3.9.0?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM José Armando García Sancio
>> <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Colin,
>>>
>>> We found a bug that we should fix for 3.9.0
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17608). Alyssa is going
>>> to work on the fix and we expect a PR soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -José
>>>

Reply via email to