> Muralidhar Basani <muralidhar.bas...@aiven.io.invalid> 於 2024年9月15日 晚上9:02 寫道： > > With this, I think, users don't have to make any explicit changes in their > code, if their provider is reload4j. And if it's a different provider (like > logback, log4j), they would have to upgrade that to match it with slf4j.
If upgrading the matched provider is the only explicit change and we expect users have responsibility to keep consistent version when using other providers , could we write it down to the KIP? That means we will update slf4j without KIP in the future except for specific reason. Best, Chia-Ping
