Hi all,

This KIP needs one more binding vote to pass. Please review the KIP. Thanks!

--
Kamal

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 8:11 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jun,
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> 1. purgatoryName = RemoteListOffsets
> 2. We want to emit the metric at the partition level. Thanks for catching
> this!
>
> Updated the public interfaces section in the KIP!
>
> --
> Kamal
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 3:14 AM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Kamal,
>>
>> Thanks for the KIP. Just a couple of minor comments.
>>
>> Since we use the purgatory name as the metric tag, could you spell out the
>> exact new purgatory name for remote list offset?
>>   private val metricsTags = Map("delayedOperation" ->
>> purgatoryName).asJava
>>   metricsGroup.newGauge("PurgatorySize", () => watched, metricsTags)
>>   metricsGroup.newGauge("NumDelayedOperations", () => numDelayed,
>> metricsTags)
>>
>> Why is the ExpiresPerSec metric tagged at topic level instead of the
>> partition level like the produce request or the global level like the
>> fetch
>> request?
>>
>> Jun
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 12:04 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
>> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I would like to start a discussion thread on KIP-1075
>> > <
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1075%3A+Introduce+delayed+remote+list+offsets+purgatory+to+make+LIST_OFFSETS+async
>> > >
>> > to
>> > make the remote LIST_OFFSETS an async operation.
>> >
>> > The KIP is here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1075%3A+Introduce+delayed+remote+list+offsets+purgatory+to+make+LIST_OFFSETS+async
>> >
>> > Draft PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16602
>> >
>> > Please take a look. Feedbacks and suggestions are welcome.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Kamal
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to