Rich,
thanks for resurrecting this KIP. I was not part of the original
discussion back in the day, but personally agree with your assessment
that making headers available in the callbacks would make developer's
life much simpler.
For the KIP itself, starting with "Public Interface" section, everything
is formatted as "strike through". Can you fix this? It's confusing as
it's apparently not correctly formatted, but unclear which (if any)
parts should be formatted like this. In general, wiki pages have
history, so strike-through should be used rather rarely but the wiki
page should just contain the latest proposal. (If one want to see the
history, it's there anyway).
-Matthias
On 7/23/24 6:36 AM, Kevin Lam wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for starting the discussion. Latency Measurement and Tracing
Completeness are both good reasons to support this feature, and would be
interested to see this move forward.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:15 PM Rich C. <chenjy.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I hope this email finds you well.
I would like to start a discussion on KIP-512. The initial version of
KIP-512 was created in 2019, and I have resurrected it in 2024 with more
details about the motivation behind it.
You can view the current version of the KIP here: KIP-512: Make Record
Headers Available in onAcknowledgement.
<
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-512%3A+make+Record+Headers+available+in+onAcknowledgement
Let's focus on discussing the necessity of this feature first. If we agree
on its importance, we can then move on to discussing the proposed changes.
Looking forward to your feedback.
Best regards,
Rich
