Thanks everyone! I'm going to close the vote. Martijn Visser +1 Justine Olshan +1 (binding) Omnia Ibrahim +1 Jason Gustafson +1 (binding) Jun Rao +1 (binding)
The KIP is accepted. -Artem On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:57 AM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > Hi, Artem, > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me. > > Jun > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 9:41 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io.invalid > > > wrote: > > > +1 Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 5:13 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I had a look at the discussion thread and the KIP looks exciting. > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > Best > > > Omnia > > > > > > On 1 Dec 2023, at 19:06, Artem Livshits <alivsh...@confluent.io > .INVALID> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is a voting thread for > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-939%3A+Support+Participation+in+2PC > > > . > > > > > > The KIP proposes extending Kafka transaction support (that already uses > > 2PC > > > under the hood) to enable atomicity of dual writes to Kafka and an > > external > > > database, and helps to fix a long standing Flink issue. > > > > > > An example of code that uses the dual write recipe with JDBC and should > > > work for most SQL databases is here > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14231. > > > > > > The FLIP for the sister fix in Flink is here > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=255071710 > > > > > > -Artem > > > > > >
