+1 Thanks for the KIP! On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 5:13 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had a look at the discussion thread and the KIP looks exciting. > +1 non-binding > > Best > Omnia > > On 1 Dec 2023, at 19:06, Artem Livshits <alivsh...@confluent.io.INVALID> > wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a voting thread for > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-939%3A+Support+Participation+in+2PC > . > > The KIP proposes extending Kafka transaction support (that already uses 2PC > under the hood) to enable atomicity of dual writes to Kafka and an external > database, and helps to fix a long standing Flink issue. > > An example of code that uses the dual write recipe with JDBC and should > work for most SQL databases is here > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14231. > > The FLIP for the sister fix in Flink is here > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=255071710 > > -Artem >
