Hi Hailey. I'm +1 (binding), but could you add a "Rejected Alternatives" section to the KIP and mention the "--required-config " option that we decided against and the reason why we made the decision to reject it? There were some other small things (dash instead of dot in the parameter names, --node-id instead of --broker-id), but cosmetic things like this don't warrant a mention, so I think there's just the one thing to document.
Thanks for the KIP, and thanks for adjusting it along the way as the discussion moved forward. Ron Ron On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:00 AM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:48 AM Kamal Chandraprakash > <kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 12:55 Hailey Ni <h...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow users to independently > > > stop KRaft processes. > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+processes > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Hailey > > >
