-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23692/#review48392
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks good. Thanks for improving our tools. I have a minor comment. 


kafka-patch-review.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/23692/#comment84952>

    formatted patch is a little misleading and is a git specific command. diff 
is easier to understand. So I'd recommend we keep the message as is.


- Neha Narkhede


On July 18, 2014, 8:58 p.m., Dong Lin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23692/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 18, 2014, 8:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1550
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1550
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1550 Patch review tool should use git format-patch to generate patch
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kafka-patch-review.py dc45549f886440f1721c60aab9aa0a4af9b4cbef 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23692/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dong Lin
> 
>

Reply via email to