FWIW, I think the "triaged" label is a great idea for reducing the workload on committers. It would perhaps help in reducing our open PR count and increase the velocity of contributions to the project.
-- Divij Vaidya On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:49 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <viktor.somo...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > >One thing that might make sense to do maybe is to add frequent > contributors > >with the "triage" role, so they could label PRs they reviewed and they can > >be taken by committers for a further review and potential merge. What do > >you think? > > In addition to labeling commits as stale I think the opposite as said above > (triage and label new PRs) is a very good idea too. We often try to review > each other's commits in the team before/after publishing them upstream. > Such commits I think would filter the incoming PRs well and make overall > quality better. > Would it be possible to do this? I'd be happy to be triager. > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 4:23 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey David, > > > > Just reviving on this thread, do you have some final decision on this now > > with all the feedbacks received so far? > > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:41 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > I think it's a good idea to use the bot for auto closing stale PRs. The > > > ideal flow would be: > > > > > > 1. Write a comment and add stale label > > > 2. If user responds saying that the PR is still valid, the stale label > is > > > removed > > > 3. Otherwise, the PR is closed > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, 2:22 AM David Jacot <da...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi team, > > > > > > > > I find our ever growing back of PRs a little frustrating, don't > > > > you? I just made a pass over all the list and a huge chunk > > > > of the PRs are abandoned, outdated or irrelevant with the > > > > current code base. For instance, we still have PRs opened > > > > back in 2015. > > > > > > > > There is not a Github Action [1] for automatically marking > > > > PRs as stale and to automatically close them as well. How > > > > would the community feel about enabling this? I think that > > > > we could mark a PR as stable after one year and close it > > > > a month after if there are no new activities. Reopening a > > > > closed PR is really easy so there is no real arm is closing > > > > it. > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/actions/stale > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > > >
