Hey David,

Just reviving on this thread, do you have some final decision on this now
with all the feedbacks received so far?

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:41 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> I think it's a good idea to use the bot for auto closing stale PRs. The
> ideal flow would be:
>
> 1. Write a comment and add stale label
> 2. If user responds saying that the PR is still valid, the stale label is
> removed
> 3. Otherwise, the PR is closed
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, 2:22 AM David Jacot <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi team,
> >
> > I find our ever growing back of PRs a little frustrating, don't
> > you? I just made a pass over all the list and a huge chunk
> > of the PRs are abandoned, outdated or irrelevant with the
> > current code base. For instance, we still have PRs opened
> > back in 2015.
> >
> > There is not a Github Action [1] for automatically marking
> > PRs as stale and to automatically close them as well. How
> > would the community feel about enabling this? I think that
> > we could mark a PR as stable after one year and close it
> > a month after if there are no new activities. Reopening a
> > closed PR is really easy so there is no real arm is closing
> > it.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/actions/stale
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to