Just noticed you started up a new DISCUSS thread for this KIP with the updated KIP number -- I'll copy my response over to the latest thread.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:22 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP! I'm 100% on board with this (obviously :P) and the KIP > itself looks good to me > overall. Just one clarification I think you should make: > > In the *Public Interfaces* section you say "It won't affect the current > consumers" -- this is only true > if those current consumers have explicitly set the* > partition.assignment.strategy > *config on their > clients. If they've been relying on the default thus far, they will need > to either follow the safe upgrade > path as described in KIP-429 or else set the > *partition.assignment.strategy* config to one of the non- > cooperative assignors during the rolling upgrade if they wish to remain on > EAGER and/or perform > the upgrade in just a single rolling bounce. > > On that note: > We have some thoughts for improving the upgrade experience to actually > reduce the > safe upgrade path to just a single rolling bounce. This is still in > progress and we need to > work out all the kinks so I wouldn't commit to a single rolling bounce > upgrade as part of > this KIP, but it's worth noting that by 3.0 we may be in an even better > position with regards > to this assignor. The ticket is > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12477 > > Cheers, > Sophie > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:59 AM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thank you ! >> >> Sagar. >> >> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 2:21 PM, Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Sagar, >> > No problem. I changed my KIP to KIP-726, and also added your KIP into >> the >> > KIP list table. >> > >> > I'll send another discussion mail later for KIP-726. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Luke >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 4:41 PM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hey Luke, >> > > >> > > There's a conflict in the KIP numbers. I have also used 725 for the >> KiP I >> > > had written last week; >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=177047930 >> > > . >> > > I had incremented the number while creating this but forgot to add it >> > here. >> > > >> > > Do you want me to change the KIP number or would you it? >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > Sagar. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:53 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi everyone, >> > > > >> > > > I'd like to discuss the following proposal to make the >> > > > CooperativeStickyAssignor as the default assignor. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-725%3A+Make+the+CooperativeStickyAssignor+as+the+default+assignor >> > > > >> > > > Any comments are welcomed. >> > > > >> > > > Thank you. >> > > > Luke >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
