Hi David,

Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list
issue, but based on your suggestion, I pinged the PR
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123.
Since I got no response, I updated KIP-635 to deprecate --broker-list. Will
update the PR related to KIP-635 to reflect that change.

Thanks,
Daniel

David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 10., H,
20:48):

> Hi Daniel,
>
> I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server`
> to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation,
> I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If
> not,
> we could do it as part of your PR directly.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán <urb.dani...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being
> > implemented.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> >
> > Dániel Urbán <urb.dani...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 31.,
> P,
> > 9:01):
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open:
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123
> > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you
> think
> > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30.,
> Cs,
> > > 17:52):
> > >
> > >> Hi Daniel,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the KIP.
> > >>
> > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499.
> > >> KAFKA-8507
> > >> is resolved
> > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to
> > >> include "--bootstrap-server"
> > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the
> > >> implementation.
> > >>
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> David
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash <
> > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP!
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar <
> manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +1 (binding)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks for the KIP!
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán <
> urb.dani...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi everyone,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Daniel
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass <viktorsomo...@gmail.com> ezt írta
> (időpont:
> > >> 2020.
> > >> > > > júl.
> > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06):
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán <
> > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Hello everyone,
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the
> > >> > > > GetOffsetShell
> > >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding
> > new
> > >> > > > filtering
> > >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308:
> > >> > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple
> > >> topics,
> > >> > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be
> > >> > changed
> > >> > > as
> > >> > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed,
> as
> > >> some
> > >> > of
> > >> > > > its
> > >> > > > > > motivations were outdated.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > Daniel
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to